Ed Tech Blog
Introduction
Over the last decade many researchers have devoted their time and effort to examining how Facebook is being used educationally. The logic of this examination stems from the fact that approximately 90% of students in the United States are using a social networking website (Junco 2012; Fogel & Nehmad, 2009), and that the primary social networking website used is Facebook (Junco 2012). In short, this group understands that bringing educational material to students via a medium they visit several times a day will likely lead to enhanced learning.
In an earlier post the highest quality research articles related to Facebook were described. This was done in order to provide a complete overview of how Facebook is used by teachers to enhance instruction and engage in self-driven professional development. The paper also described students’ attitudes toward educational Facebook use, which was positive overall, and made recommendations for appropriate educational Facebook etiquette (for both teachers and students). Another aspect of educational Facebook use that was touched upon, but not discussed extensively, was educational Facebook research ethics. The literature review referenced two articles in particular that “covertly” observed students’ Facebook timelines (i.e., profiles containing general student information and a chronological record of Facebook interactions). Upon review of the two articles in question it became clear that a deeper examination is necessary. In order to fulfill this need the two potentially ethically controversial educational Facebook use articles will be analyzed using scholarly literature regarding online research ethics. Ultimately, it will be identified whether the two studies can be deemed ethical or unethical. Recommendations for conducting ethical educational Facebook research will also be made.
Background
The first of the two possibly ethically controversial studies by Hart and Steinbrecher (2011) was designed to identify how pre-service teachers use Facebook. In order to...
In this post we will examine the Denise Knowles’ web seminar entitled “How to integrate Facebook into your teaching” in terms of how it can applied in the classroom. In the web seminar, Knowles explains a range of ways in which Facebook can be used by teachers on a daily basis. First, the general methods of Facebook integration presented by Knowles will be detailed. Following this, I will discuss which methods can be be applied a world language classroom infused with technology (like my own), and which ones not. It is recommended that readers have a basic understanding of what Facebook is and how it generally functions before continuing on.
Some Background Information
According to Knowles 90% of all students in the United States utilize Facebook (and this statistic remains true), the most used social networking web site. Considering the fact that such a large percentage of students are competent users, Knowles suggests that teachers use Facebook as an educational tool. The idea is that students are already using Facebook competently and often, and that bringing course content to them rather than bringing them to the course content makes sense. Davis (2010) supports this idea as well.
On Facebook...
Read more: Effectively Integrating Facebook into the Classroom
Educational Facebook Use Policies
Appropriate methods of integrating Facebook into educational settings, and into the general lives of educators, are beginning to be introduced via scholarly research. Many educational institutions, however, have not yet established educational Facebook use policies. The majority of the literature impresses upon the reader the delicate nature of educational Facebook use (particularly in basic education settings). Davis’ (2010) article and those before hers collectively describe the entire spectrum of educational Facebook use. In short, some institutions officially encourage appropriate and professional educational Facebook use, some ban it entirely, and others have simply not acknowledged educational Facebook use (Davis, 2010; Maranto & Barton, 2010; Carter, 2008). While many institutions avoid educational Facebook use policy making, Carter (2008) notes The Association of Texas Professional Educators, which provides official recommendations for appropriate educational Facebook use. This guide, for example, describes how educators should proceed if they receive friendship requests from students. In the article, Carter ultimately makes a call to action, which is in essence a recommendation to engage in statistically beneficial educational Facebook use while using common sense to guide all educator actions on Facebook.
Implications & Recommendations
Considering the existing research, there are several implications...
In this two-part post we’ll take a look at the educational applications of Facebook.
Introduction and Rationale for Facebook Use
The use of Facebook as an educational tool appears to be a polarizing topic among many of those within the field of education. A large majority of educators, particularly those serving in basic education (i.e. K-12) capacities, straight-out fear Facebook use, having been scared (and scarred) by the many stories of disciplinary actions taken against educators who used Facebook unprofessionally (whether by accident or knowingly) (Carter, 2008). Others avoid Facebook use out of disinterest, being of the mindset that education likely has little to gain by integrating a media that was designed to be social by nature (Charnigo & Barnett-Ellis, 2007). The targets of this article, however, are educators that acknowledge the works of educational Facebook use researchers. This body of researchers recognizes an opportunity to enhance traditional learning using Facebook (Chou, 2012; Junco, 2012; Ömer 2012; Ranieri et al. 2012; Yunus et al., 2012; Hart & Steinbrecher, 2011; Lampe et al., 2011; Malita 2011; Promnitz-Hayashi, 2011; Teclehaimanot & Hickman, 2011; Davis, 2010; Kabilan & Abidin, 2010; Maranto & Baron 2010; Madge et al., 2009; Muñoz & Towner, 2009;
There are “mind-game” exercises you can do that allegedly help with memory. Similarly, there are innumerable articles about vitamins, minerals, supplements and herbs that claim to enhance memory “vitality.” But one thing is certain when it comes to memory- as you age, your brain becomes less flexible and the world around you becomes more distracting. Short-term memory recollection is compromised and focus is more difficult.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, “In 2015, there were 11.8 million college and university students under age 25 and 8.1 million students 25 years old and over.” Also of note, the fastest growing cohort in US colleges and universities is the non-traditional student, which includes students 25 years and older. Students 25 years and older may face obstacles to learning and educational success in colleges and universities that traditionally cater to the traditional student population. We’ve written, prior, about non-traditional student enrollment being an opportunity for growth for colleges and universities with declining enrollment. But these opportunities come with the challenge of retaining this population of students who may not retain information the same as a traditional student.
How does this affect educational technologists? Individuals of all ages seem to...
Read more: Education Technology For Impact, Engagement, Memory
A few possible consequential changes (positive? negative?) may occur if higher ed institutions adopt AVaaS:
- · The change of general campus technologies (from an institution’s budgetary forecasting POV) from Capital Expenditures (CapX) to Operating Expenditures (OpX).
- · The potential reduction in product decision making/ specification for the institution.
- · The potential decrease in technology staff/ employees as tier 2/3 support become a piece of the service model.
- · The potential for increased down-time of rooms with the reduction on-campus staff for tier 1/ helpdesk calls.
- · The concept (yay?) of guaranteed pre-planned and approved upgrades to all rooms under service contract- reducing legacy technology support and maintenance calls.
- · The potential for...