Ed Tech Blog
In this two-part post we’ll take a look at the educational applications of Facebook.
Introduction and Rationale for Facebook Use
The use of Facebook as an educational tool appears to be a polarizing topic among many of those within the field of education. A large majority of educators, particularly those serving in basic education (i.e. K-12) capacities, straight-out fear Facebook use, having been scared (and scarred) by the many stories of disciplinary actions taken against educators who used Facebook unprofessionally (whether by accident or knowingly) (Carter, 2008). Others avoid Facebook use out of disinterest, being of the mindset that education likely has little to gain by integrating a media that was designed to be social by nature (Charnigo & Barnett-Ellis, 2007). The targets of this article, however, are educators that acknowledge the works of educational Facebook use researchers. This body of researchers recognizes an opportunity to enhance traditional learning using Facebook (Chou, 2012; Junco, 2012; Ömer 2012; Ranieri et al. 2012; Yunus et al., 2012; Hart & Steinbrecher, 2011; Lampe et al., 2011; Malita 2011; Promnitz-Hayashi, 2011; Teclehaimanot & Hickman, 2011; Davis, 2010; Kabilan & Abidin, 2010; Maranto & Baron 2010; Madge et al., 2009; Muñoz & Towner, 2009; Selwyn, 2009; Carter 2008; Mazer et al. 2007; Stutzman, 2005). What has compelled this group to become knowledgeable about educational Facebook use? To begin with, the majority of the literature has accepted the statistics that 90% of the nation’s students are using a social networking website daily (Junco 2012; Fogel & Nehmad, 2009; Steinfeld et al., 2008) and that 97% of those students are using Facebook (Junco, 2012). Now combine this ever increasing statistic with the versatile interaction tools Facebook continues to add. The result? A group of educators who recognize the sheer logic of bringing educational material to students...
There are “mind-game” exercises you can do that allegedly help with memory. Similarly, there are innumerable articles about vitamins, minerals, supplements and herbs that claim to enhance memory “vitality.” But one thing is certain when it comes to memory- as you age, your brain becomes less flexible and the world around you becomes more distracting. Short-term memory recollection is compromised and focus is more difficult.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, “In 2015, there were 11.8 million college and university students under age 25 and 8.1 million students 25 years old and over.” Also of note, the fastest growing cohort in US colleges and universities is the non-traditional student, which includes students 25 years and older. Students 25 years and older may face obstacles to learning and educational success in colleges and universities that traditionally cater to the traditional student population. We’ve written, prior, about non-traditional student enrollment being an opportunity for growth for colleges and universities with declining enrollment. But these opportunities come with the challenge of retaining this population of students who may not retain information the same as a traditional student.
How does this affect educational technologists? Individuals of all ages seem to...
Read more: Education Technology For Impact, Engagement, Memory
A few possible consequential changes (positive? negative?) may occur if higher ed institutions adopt AVaaS:
- · The change of general campus technologies (from an institution’s budgetary forecasting POV) from Capital Expenditures (CapX) to Operating Expenditures (OpX).
- · The potential reduction in product decision making/ specification for the institution.
- · The potential decrease in technology staff/ employees as tier 2/3 support become a piece of the service model.
- · The potential for increased down-time of rooms with the reduction on-campus staff for tier 1/ helpdesk calls.
- · The concept (yay?) of guaranteed pre-planned and approved upgrades to all rooms under service contract- reducing legacy technology support and maintenance calls.
- · The potential for...
This is a guest post provided by Nanda Krish from Wisewire. I found the information to be relevant and in line with the value of content we like to provide on our Collaborate! blog. Please note: FSR doesn't endorse (or not endorse) Wisewire, as we have not evaluated their services. But we thank them for sharing this information with our readers! Enjoy:
You have a unique challenge ahead of you. You know valuable learning tools are emerging and your institution needs to keep up with educational trends. But working within a budget, juggling your day-to-day tasks, and trying to have meaningful conversations with people short on time is not easy. How do you convince multiple education professionals to invest in adaptive learning tools and materials (available from numerous online sources, including Wisewire), which may be an unfamiliar approach to student learning?
What Matters?
Gaining support for any initiative in higher education will always be contingent on whether the idea is best for students. It’s important to completely understand the benefits of adaptive learning tools for individual students and be prepared to describe these benefits to key stakeholders. In addition to basic questions, leaders will have their own specific areas of...
Involving and engaging commuter students on campus is a priority for schools. Generally, commuter student retention is lower than students living on-campus or in college owned housing. This could be the result of a number of factors: commuter students not feeling connected to the school brand (house proud); lack of social connectedness; increased distractions/ responsibilities from non-academic sources; lack of amenities on school grounds created for their complex lifestyle, etc.
StateUniversity.com claims, “Because commuter students spend limited time on campus and limited time creating relationships with other students, faculty, and staff, they have fewer opportunities to engage in quality interactions with these individuals. Therefore they are less likely to make a strong commitment to the university or its programs and are more likely to drop out of school than residential students.”
Fortunately, technology offers a conduit to increased connectivity. While technology alone will not be a campus cure-all for commuter retention, it can help support engagement, encourage group interactivity and provide conveniences to keep commuters on campus longer.
- Technology Rich Lounges- lounges located in central locations are good for commuter students who need a place to park in between classes. Dedicated areas with student- accessible TV’s can promote student interaction.
Read more: How Can Technology Help Engage The Commuter Student?
This article was originally published on rAVe Pubs. It has been reposted here with the author's permission because this message is too important to not spread. In addition, the link to the podcast mentioned, can be found here.
PASS: An Alliance You Need to Know About
By Scott Tiner
rAVe Columnist
Last month for rAVe Ed, I wrote an article about school safety. I was inspired by the Parkland students, who suffered a horrible tragedy and decided to do something to make sure others did not have to suffer a similar tragedy. I specifically avoided talking politics and law. I think there is a place for that, but this is not it. I had a vision where those of us in the AV industry could use our skills, talents and numbers to help make schools safer. When I wrote it, I realized it was a huge ask and may not be very likely, but I dared to dream. The morning after the article was first published, I heard from a friend in the industry. He had read the article and was inspired by it. He wanted to host a podcast to try and publicize the idea, and asked if I would...
Read more: Guest Post: PASS: An Alliance You Need to Know About