Ed Tech Blog
Educational Facebook Use Policies
Appropriate methods of integrating Facebook into educational settings, and into the general lives of educators, are beginning to be introduced via scholarly research. Many educational institutions, however, have not yet established educational Facebook use policies. The majority of the literature impresses upon the reader the delicate nature of educational Facebook use (particularly in basic education settings). Davis’ (2010) article and those before hers collectively describe the entire spectrum of educational Facebook use. In short, some institutions officially encourage appropriate and professional educational Facebook use, some ban it entirely, and others have simply not acknowledged educational Facebook use (Davis, 2010; Maranto & Barton, 2010; Carter, 2008). While many institutions avoid educational Facebook use policy making, Carter (2008) notes The Association of Texas Professional Educators, which provides official recommendations for appropriate educational Facebook use. This guide, for example, describes how educators should proceed if they receive friendship requests from students. In the article, Carter ultimately makes a call to action, which is in essence a recommendation to engage in statistically beneficial educational Facebook use while using common sense to guide all educator actions on Facebook.
Implications & Recommendations
Considering the existing research, there are several implications regarding Facebook as an educational tool. Based on the literature, students and teachers alike seem to have significantly positive attitudes toward possible and actual educational Facebook use. Therefore, it makes sense to acknowledge these attitudes by moving forward with the development of educational Facebook use methods. While literature concerning online privacy and teacher self-disclosure on Facebook may appear to be conflicting, logical and generalizable recommendations can be synthesized. These recommendations include being aware of institution policies regarding Facebook use, being knowledgeable about educational Facebook use and its methods, and using professional judgment combined with an understanding of educational morality.
In this two-part post we’ll take a look at the educational applications of Facebook.
Introduction and Rationale for Facebook Use
The use of Facebook as an educational tool appears to be a polarizing topic among many of those within the field of education. A large majority of educators, particularly those serving in basic education (i.e. K-12) capacities, straight-out fear Facebook use, having been scared (and scarred) by the many stories of disciplinary actions taken against educators who used Facebook unprofessionally (whether by accident or knowingly) (Carter, 2008). Others avoid Facebook use out of disinterest, being of the mindset that education likely has little to gain by integrating a media that was designed to be social by nature (Charnigo & Barnett-Ellis, 2007). The targets of this article, however, are educators that acknowledge the works of educational Facebook use researchers. This body of researchers recognizes an opportunity to enhance traditional learning using Facebook (Chou, 2012; Junco, 2012; Ömer 2012; Ranieri et al. 2012; Yunus et al., 2012; Hart & Steinbrecher, 2011; Lampe et al., 2011; Malita 2011; Promnitz-Hayashi, 2011; Teclehaimanot & Hickman, 2011; Davis, 2010; Kabilan & Abidin, 2010; Maranto & Baron 2010; Madge et al., 2009; Muñoz & Towner, 2009;
There are “mind-game” exercises you can do that allegedly help with memory. Similarly, there are innumerable articles about vitamins, minerals, supplements and herbs that claim to enhance memory “vitality.” But one thing is certain when it comes to memory- as you age, your brain becomes less flexible and the world around you becomes more distracting. Short-term memory recollection is compromised and focus is more difficult.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, “In 2015, there were 11.8 million college and university students under age 25 and 8.1 million students 25 years old and over.” Also of note, the fastest growing cohort in US colleges and universities is the non-traditional student, which includes students 25 years and older. Students 25 years and older may face obstacles to learning and educational success in colleges and universities that traditionally cater to the traditional student population. We’ve written, prior, about non-traditional student enrollment being an opportunity for growth for colleges and universities with declining enrollment. But these opportunities come with the challenge of retaining this population of students who may not retain information the same as a traditional student.
How does this affect educational technologists? Individuals of all ages seem to...
Read more: Education Technology For Impact, Engagement, Memory
This is a guest post provided by Nanda Krish from Wisewire. I found the information to be relevant and in line with the value of content we like to provide on our Collaborate! blog. Please note: FSR doesn't endorse (or not endorse) Wisewire, as we have not evaluated their services. But we thank them for sharing this information with our readers! Enjoy:
You have a unique challenge ahead of you. You know valuable learning tools are emerging and your institution needs to keep up with educational trends. But working within a budget, juggling your day-to-day tasks, and trying to have meaningful conversations with people short on time is not easy. How do you convince multiple education professionals to invest in adaptive learning tools and materials (available from numerous online sources, including Wisewire), which may be an unfamiliar approach to student learning?
What Matters?
Gaining support for any initiative in higher education will always be contingent on whether the idea is best for students. It’s important to completely understand the benefits of adaptive learning tools for individual students and be prepared to describe these benefits to key stakeholders. In addition to basic questions, leaders will have their own specific areas of...
Involving and engaging commuter students on campus is a priority for schools. Generally, commuter student retention is lower than students living on-campus or in college owned housing. This could be the result of a number of factors: commuter students not feeling connected to the school brand (house proud); lack of social connectedness; increased distractions/ responsibilities from non-academic sources; lack of amenities on school grounds created for their complex lifestyle, etc.
StateUniversity.com claims, “Because commuter students spend limited time on campus and limited time creating relationships with other students, faculty, and staff, they have fewer opportunities to engage in quality interactions with these individuals. Therefore they are less likely to make a strong commitment to the university or its programs and are more likely to drop out of school than residential students.”
Fortunately, technology offers a conduit to increased connectivity. While technology alone will not be a campus cure-all for commuter retention, it can help support engagement, encourage group interactivity and provide conveniences to keep commuters on campus longer.
- Technology Rich Lounges- lounges located in central locations are good for commuter students who need a place to park in between classes. Dedicated areas with student- accessible TV’s can promote student interaction.
Read more: How Can Technology Help Engage The Commuter Student?
At the Midwest College and University AV Summit, we were able to tour one of the most technology rich 2-year colleges I have seen- Saint Paul College. While the technology in the classrooms was impressive, it was the technology in the technical areas of the college that were truly exciting. In general, 2 year colleges are under-funded and are, therefore, stuck in a cycle where the budget only allows for minimal upgrades over time. Larger technology investments are typically put on hold, indefinitely.
Saint Paul College is different. Consistently ranked in the top 10 technical and community colleges in the US, they have found a way to stand out. We toured high-technology sim labs for their nursing and medical sciences programs with observation rooms and lecture capture equipment tailored to help students and faculty review the information they need, effectively and efficiently. We tried out divisible flex-rooms with installed wireless presentation products for content sharing.
VR Technology for Skilled Trades
But, one of the unique spaces that made an impression on me was the welding shop. Located in the basement, they teach four or five (or more) different welding techniques in this large and well-outfitted area. Available to students...
- Three Signs It May Be Time To Look For Another AV Consultant
- What Students Want: Experiential Learning with Nature INSIDE the Classroom
- John Jay College of Criminal Justice Selects FSR HuddleVU Collaboration Systems for Student Group Study Initiatives
- How Well Do You Work With Your Institution’s Interiors Team?